Emily Ratajkowski has triggered a heated debate with a vitriol declaration regarding the recent space trip organized by Blue Origin, which saw the famous singer Katy Perry among the participants. The American model and actress has not hidden her disgust for what she considers a hypocrisy, aiming for the finger at those who professed themselves worried about the planet but then participate in a project financed and carried out by a company accused of contributing heavily to global pollution. His words, pronounced with a frankness that leaves no room for interpretations, have turned on the spotlight on an increasingly controversial theme: the role of the great corporations in space tourism and their environmental impact.

“Do you worry about the planet but get on a spacecraft built and financed by a company that is destroying it alone? […] are literally disgusted!” Ratajkowski said in an interview with an international magazine. His comment refers directly to the flight of Blue Origin, the aerospace company founded by Jeff Bezos, who brought Katy Perry and other passengers to a suborbital journey on 10 April 2025. Il Volo, celebrated as a step forward in space tourism, received criticism from different environmentalists, who see in these missions a unbridled luxury that goes to the expiry of the environment.

Blue Origin, together with other companies such as Elon Musk’s Spacex, was at the center of disputes for the ecological impact of its activities. The rockets used for space travel emit large quantities of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, contributing to climate change at a time when the planet is already facing unprecedented environmental crises. In addition, the production of these rockets requires significant natural resources, often extracted in an unsustainable way. Environmentalists have repeatedly denounced how these missions, often presented as a symbol of human progress, are actually an example of waste and disinterest in ecological issues.

Katy Perry, who shared his enthusiasm for experience on social media, describing it as “a dream that became reality”, probably did not expect such a ferocious reaction. The singer, who in the past has expressed himself in favor of environmental causes, has become the main target of the criticism of Ratajkowski. The latter did not hesitate to question Perry’s consistency, accusing her of hypocrisy for accepting to participate in a journey that, according to her, contradicts the values ​​that the singer claims to support. “You can’t say that you want to save the planet and then do such a thing. It is absurd,” added Ratajkowski, feeding a debate that quickly took hold online.

The audience’s reaction was mixed. On the one hand, many fans of Ratajkowski have applauded his courage in publicly denouncing a problem that is often ignored in the name of technological progress. On platforms like X, several users have shared its point of view, underlining how celebrities must give good example, especially on such crucial issues such as sustainability. “Finally someone who says things as they are! Enough with these useless missions that destroy the planet,” wrote a user, receiving thousands of likes. However, others defended Katy Perry, claiming that her journey was a personal experience and that it should not be judged so hard. “Katy has the right to live her dreams. It is not she who manages Blue Origin,” replied another fan.

The controversy has also rekindled the debate on the role of large technological companies and their founders, such as Jeff Bezos, in promoting space tourism without adequately tackling the environmental consequences. Blue Origin has tried to defend himself, declaring in a press release that is working to make his flights more sustainable and that space trips represent an investment for the future of humanity. However, these statements have not convinced everyone, and the criticisms continue to rain on the company.

Meanwhile, Katy Perry has not yet responded directly to the accusations of Ratajkowski, but sources close to the singer say that she remained surprised and injured by the words of the model. Perry, who has always tried to maintain a positive and socially committed image, could soon release a declaration to clarify his position. Some hypothesize that it could use this opportunity to further sensitize the theme of sustainability, perhaps announcing a concrete commitment to compensate for the environmental impact of his journey.

This story has highlighted an increasingly evident contradiction in the modern world: the tension between the desire to explore new frontiers and the need to protect the planet. The words of Ratajkowski, although hard, had the merit of bringing attention to a real problem, forcing both the celebrities and companies to reflect on their responsibilities. While spatial tourism continues to grow, the debate on the environmental impact of these missions does not seem destined to turn off soon, and the comparison between supporters and critics is destined to continue.