The High-Stakes Game of Power and Public Funds: How a WNBA Team’s New Home Sparked a Financial Uprising in Chicago

It was supposed to be a monumental moment for a rising professional sports franchise. A groundbreaking ceremony, a $38 million state-of-the-art facility, and a new era of athletic prowess for the Chicago Sky. On the surface, the partnership between the WNBA team and the Village of Bedford Park seemed like a win-win, a testament to a public-private collaboration that would elevate the team’s performance and inject life into the local community. But a stunning financial investigation has ripped the celebratory veil away, exposing a high-stakes drama of alleged backroom deals, questionable financial commitments, and a fierce public backlash that has left many wondering, “How is this man still in office?”

At the heart of the scandal is a citizen audit conducted by Tiauna Jackson, a talent agent and law student whose relentless pursuit of financial transparency has unearthed a series of startling allegations. The story, as told through her viral online videos, paints a picture of a deal gone terribly wrong, with public officials seemingly bending over backward for a private entity at the expense of taxpayers. The controversy centers on the Chicago Sky’s new practice facility in Bedford Park, a project that was heralded as a “transformational vision” by Sky co-owner Nadia Rawlinson.

The central allegation revolves around a specific breach of contract. Jackson claims “Even though the Mayor knows that the Chicago Sky haven’t paid them all, he still never initiated any actions against them for breach of contract,” referring to a financial commitment that was due in January 2025. This wasn’t a minor detail; it was a fundamental part of the agreement. A key element of the deal was a $1.5 million escrow deposit, a seemingly simple and standard business transaction. Yet, Jackson alleges, this deposit was never made. The team had a history of financial non-compliance that should have torpedoed the deal long before construction even began. “How this man still has a job is beyond me,” she stated, her voice full of incredulity. “How this man is not in prison is still beyond me. How this entire city has been running around handing out all this money to people without the proper checks and balances is beyond me.” 

This is where the story takes a sharp and controversial turn. Despite the alleged breach, the Bedford Park mayor, identified in the video as David Brady, reportedly failed to “initiate any actions against them.” This inaction is what has fueled the most significant public outrage. Rather than holding the team accountable, Jackson’s investigation claims the mayor went in the opposite direction, “commit[ting] to a $7 million subsidy.” This sudden infusion of public funds came at a time when “the Sky made changes that ran up the cost of construction and increased it by $18 million,”  Jackson said. The mayor, according to Jackson, was on record in a May 2025 meeting admitting the Sky never paid.

The drama escalated in that same meeting when the mayor reportedly confessed that the Sky had been making changes to the facility without consulting the Village of Bedford Park, completely “out of the loop.” This revelation painted a picture of a partnership where one side was operating without the other’s knowledge or consent, a situation that put the village’s financial interests at risk. The mayor’s own words, as transcribed by Jackson, reveal a sense of frustration with the team’s independent actions, stating, “They’ve kept the village completely out of the loop.”

From the outside, the project was still presented as a model of civic and corporate harmony. In July 2024, when the project was first announced, a press release quoted Sky co-owner and operating chairman Nadia Rawlinson, who said, “We could not be more excited to announce a practice facility that will raise the bar on athletic performance, set the standard for player amenities, and support our players with exceptional resources built exclusively for them.” The official narrative highlighted a “first of its kind public-private partnership for a WNBA practice facility.” This was the public face of the deal—a partnership for progress, for the athletes, and for the community.

Bedford Park Village President David R. Brady echoed this sentiment, calling the project a “transformational vision” and thanking “our board and the Sky leadership for believing in a collective vision and investing in the future of Bedford Park.” The rhetoric was grand, full of promise, and focused on economic development and community outreach. The project was even announced with community partnerships with the Obama Foundation and the YMCA of Metro Chicago, further cementing its positive public image.

But Jackson’s investigation pulls back the curtain on this polished image. She points to the “operating agreement” itself, questioning its legality under Illinois law. “There is nothing about the operating agreement that the Village of Bedford Park entered into with the Chicago Sky that meets Illinois standards for the public purpose doctrine,” she claims. This is a highly specialized, technical argument that suggests the deal might not even serve a legitimate public purpose, a legal requirement for the use of taxpayer money. The argument essentially posits that a deal designed to benefit a private, for-profit sports team does not align with the legal standards for public spending.

The core of the issue boils down to a fundamental conflict: the mayor’s alleged unwillingness to enforce the contract versus his willingness to commit more public money to a project already facing financial difficulties. The transcript of the May 2025 meeting cited by Jackson includes a conversation between the mayor and Sky principal owner Michael Alter, who reportedly tried to argue that the facility could have been built in Chicago and that the team needed “some more concessions.” The mayor’s response, as relayed by Jackson, was a striking admission: “The mayor says you’re not going to get a better deal than this. And he’s true. He’s right. He’s telling the truth. Nobody else is dumb enough to keep giving the Sky money and risking one, your job, two jail time.”

This quote, if accurate, is the climax of the entire financial drama. It’s an alleged admission of the deal’s questionable nature, revealing a mayor who seems to be operating with a full understanding of the risks involved. It suggests a political gamble where a professional sports team is given an extraordinary amount of leeway, and a taxpayer-funded subsidy, despite allegedly failing to meet its initial obligations. The official announcements from the past year tell a story of a groundbreaking project. The allegations from this new investigation tell a story of a potential financial scandal, a public official risking his career, and a community on the hook for a deal that may not meet legal standards. The two narratives are a study in contradiction, creating a tense, unfolding situation where the public’s trust is on the line. As the controversy continues to ignite online, one thing is clear: the future of this partnership, and the careers of those involved, is far from certain. The final chapter of this high-stakes game of power and public funds has yet to be written.