Controversy burst when Imane Khelif is prevented from participating in women’s boxing due to gender eligibility rules
In a decision that rekindled a heated debate on transgender athletes in women’s sports, the Algerian driver Imane Khelif was prevented from competing in international events after not meeting the eligibility requirements under the new sex verification rules imposed by the International Boxing Association (IBA).

The rule, which cites “competitive justice and biological integrity”, attracted both support and criticism, with detractors calling it discriminatory, while supporters argue that it protects female athletes from possible physical advantages.

IBA Sex Testing Policy: What happened?

Khelif, a two -time African champion, was ready to compete in an important female tournament when IBA disqualified it abruptly after a mandatory review of eligibility. Sources confirm that the decision was based on chromosomal tests, which were allegedly not aligned with the organization’s female classification standards.

IBA policy requires athletes to have XX chromosomes to compete at female events.

Khelif’s legal genre is feminine, but its biological eligibility has been challenged based on these rules.

No public statement was made by Khelif or his team, but authorities of the Algerian boxing promised to appeal the decision.

Global reaction: “excluding and non -scientific”

Human rights groups and LGBTQ+ defenders have criticized the measure, arguing that chromosomal testing is an outdated method and flawed to determine athletic eligibility.

The organization of sports conferences Athlete Ally has classified the decision as “a dangerous precedent that transforms science into a weapon against trans women.”

Dr. Rachel McKipp, a researcher of transgender athletes, said: “Chromosomes do not determine performance – yes hormone levels. This is pure discrimination disguised as politics.”

Supporters: “Protecting Female Sport”

Meanwhile, advocates of sex -based competition categories applauded IBA’s stance.
Martina Navratilova, sports legend and fierce critic of women’s sports, tweeted: “Finally, a federation prioritizing women’s athletes. Justice matters.”

World Athletics and Fina (swimming agency) also implemented similar restrictions, citing “the need to preserve a fair competition”.

What ahead of Khelif – and the female boxing?

Khelif’s case can establish a significant precedent on how boxing and other combat sports regulate the participation of transgender athletes.

Legal challenges are expected, with possible appeals to the Sports Arbitration Court (TAS).

The COI (International Olympic Committee) has adopted a more inclusive approach, allowing transgender athletes to compitate within certain testosterone limits, but IBA’s firm position may force global adjustment.

The boxers remain divided, some fearing career disadvantages, while others require clear and science -based guidelines.

CONCLUSION: A decisive moment for sports and gender

As the debate intensifies, Khelif’s exclusion highlights the growing tension between inclusion and competition in women’s sports. With more federations adopting strict sex check policies, the future of transgender athletes in elite competitions is at stake.

Will science or human rights prevail? The boxing world – and the sports community in general – is watching closely.