In a bomb revelation that has shaken the public image of Elon Musk, the conservative influence Ashley St. Clair has revealed what she claims to be a network of secret, power and raising of transactional children, focused on her baby, Romulus. The legal and personal drama that develops is not just a battle of custody.

It is one of the most powerful men in the world who attempt to impose silence with the weight of their fortune, developing a control narrative wrapped in signs of dollar, non -dissemination and paternal distance agreements.

It all started with what many would consider a kind of modern fairy tale. Musk, then 52, approached St. Clair through social networks in May 2023, after noticing his influence on the conservative humor The Babylon Bee. His flirting quickly intensified from digital exchanges to private jet and trip invitations to meet their children.

According to reports, Musk, always sincere in his eccentricity, told St. Clair that “choose a name” after his first sexual encounter. That name later would become Romulus, a child born from a romance whirlwind and a much more complicated reality.

At the beginning of January 2024, during a trip to the Caribbean island of Saint Barthélemy, St. Clair revealed that he was ovulating. Musk response: “What are we waiting for?” Weeks later, the conception occurred. But romantic spontaneity gave way to something much colder. A paternity test carried out later would confirm that Musk was “99.9999% likely” to be the father. Instead of welcoming this new chapter, Musk supposedly moved to cover it with legal and effective links, offering St. Clair $ 15 million and $ 100,000 a month until the child turned 21, instead of Silence on the true son of his son. According to St. Clair, Birchell compared the offer of agreements beaten with other mothers of Musk’s children, including singer Grimes and Neuralink Shivon Zilis executive. It was clear that parenting preferred the raising of Musk in its terms: through compartmentalized arrangements that gave it children, but not necessarily public responsibility.

Among the strangest conditions in which Musk insisted that the baby will be delivered through the Cesarean section, a method that believes that contributes to a “larger brain.” He also asked the child not to be circumcised. St. Clair, who is Jewish and wanted a natural birth, rejected both requests.

But she agreed to keep Musk’s name from the Romulus’s birth certificate, although not without hiring a lawyer first, for Birchell’s dismay.

When Birchell then pressed her to sign documents that prohibit her from revealing Musk’s paternity, or saying something negative about him, the offer did not extend with mutual justice. Musk, the clarified documents could still speak freely about St. Clair.

In his narration, the final tail came when Musk tried to manipulate it with stories of alleged threats of murder due to his political inclinations, especially his alignment with Donald Trump. She refused to sign.

Despite the round trip legislator, St. Clair states that Musk showed moments of warmth, sending flowers on his birthday and Mother’s Day. He even tried how life could be seen within the elusive “Legion for Children” of Musk, a term that he used to describe his growing breeding of children, many of whom supposedly live in a community complex closed in Austin, Texas.

Musk wanted St. Clair and Romulus to move there, along with other mothers such as Zilis, seen as a stabilizing presence in Musk’s life. According to reports, Grimes, on the other hand, refused to live in such a configuration, and since then has publicly criticized Musk’s raising. The contrast between Zilis and Grimes, according to Birchall, was often used to manipulate St. Clair emotionally. He painted Zilis as content, Grimes as chronically unhappy and positioned Musk as the misunderstanding who tried to navigate a chaotic network of mothers, children and critics. St. Clair, however, found himself deeper into a cycle for which he never registered. By February 2025, St. Clair had had enough. In a publication on Musk’s own platform, X, he revealed that he was the father of his son. The dissemination led to a demand for paternity and custody presented in New York. According to his request, Musk had met Romulus only three times, frankly, in the months after his birth. He had not shown interest in his son’s medical updates, he had not asked for photos and had never started contact without being requested. Despite having offered her supposedly millions of secret, St. Clair says that Musk made her ghosts both her and her son when she refused to deliver control.

In March, he was seen selling his Tesla, committed to accommodate his two children, to help cover the expenses. She told a journalist that Musk had unilaterally cut her child’s support in 60% in retaliation for her refusal to remain silent. “I need to compensate for the 60% cut that Elon made to the maintenance of our son’s children,” he said, delivering the car keys to a Carvana representative. His words echoed a broader frustration: “You can verify the actions. I am not the only one who is cleaning after his disorder.” Musk’s public responses have been typically cryptic. He published in X that he was not sure of his fatherhood but that he was not against “discovering.” He admitted to having provided $ 2.5 million to St. Clair and currently sending $ 500,000 per year, while insisting that these payments depended on obedience, not the genuine paternal concern. “It’s about control with you,” she shot in a fierce publication, “and everyone can see it.” In fact, the saga reflects a broader theme in Musk’s life: an obsession with control, privacy, and everyone’s influence. Sources close to St. Clair describe Musk’s actions as punitive and reprisals.

His attempt to seal judicial records while cutting his support, they say, reveals a man determined to silence dissent, even when he claims to defend transparency in government and technology. Clair’s custody presentation described a pattern of avoidance and coldness. Musk chose not to be present at the birth of Romulus. He only briefly visited, once in New York, twice in Austin. When she proposed a move to Texas, he insisted that he stay in New York, only to disconnect completely. The legal battle has become bitter. Although judicial documents are now sealed, the presentations suggest that the judge sympathizes with the position of St. Clair, recently issuing an order to force Musk to respond. Meanwhile, Musk continues in the headlines of other women who allegedly chased the glamorous cryptographic journalist Tiffany Fong, who had the headlines of the rumors that she was pregnant with Musk’s son. According to the reports, Musk sent him money after online interactions and asked if he wanted to “join the legion.” Fong declined, stating that he wanted a more traditional family.

In the midst of all this, St. Clair says he is only trying to raise his children: Romulus and his three -year -old son of a previous relationship. She lives in a rented apartment in Manhattan, has no logistics help from Musk and relies on a full -time nanny to obtain support. Despite the opulence of Musk’s lifestyle and his position as one of the richest men in the world, the woman with whom he generated a child says that she stays with the basic concepts. Musk closing words went to both slats and symbolic. “The United States needs you to grow, son of a petulant man.” It was more than a simple personal reprimand. It was a scathing accusation of a billionaire who, according to her, values ​​the image about participation, the secret about responsibility and power over paternity. As the judicial case develops behind the sealed records and encrypted messages, one thing is safe: Romulus was born in a storm. Not politics, wealth or science, but of power, promises and limits of love when the cost of silence is $ 15 million.