Shocking: Lennox Lewis destroys Manny Pacquiao with just one word after the fight with neighborhoods!

At 11:22 AM +07 on Thursday, July 24, 2025, the boxing world is upset after a demolish comment of Lennox Lewis, the iconic British legend of heavyweights, addressed to Manny Pacquiao after his controversial tie against Mario Barrios on July 19, 2025. In a brief but scathing message published in X at 11:15 am +07, Lewis used one alone word – “overvalued” – to describe Pacquiao, unleashing a storm of reactions and questioning the legacy of the Philippine icon in the context of his recent performance. This statement has fueled an intense debate about the current relevance of Pacquiao and the state of modern boxing.

The context of the controversial tie

Pacquiao’s return to Ring after four years of inactivity took place in the MGM Grand Garden Arena, where he faced Mario Barrios for the WBB Welter title. At 46, Pacquiao exhibited flashes of his former splendor, dominating the initial rounds with their precise speed and combinations that remembered their glory days. However, Barrios, 30, responded with effective jab and a comeback in the final rounds, which led to the judges’ cards to a majority draw: 115-113 for neighborhoods, 114-114 and 114-114. The decision divided fans and analysts, with many, including Mike Tyson, arguing that Pacquiao deserved victory, although his obvious fatigue in the last assaults fed speculations about his physical decline.

The tie has kept Pacquiao in the center of the boxing conversation, with rumors of a possible rematch or a definitive retirement. His performance, although admirable to his age, did not reach the level of his past exploits as a champion in eight divisions, which seems to have motivated Lewis’s criticism in this critical moment.

The word that changed everything

At 11:15 AM +07, Lennox Lewis, the last British in unifying heavy titles before Oleksandr Usyk, published in X a single word: “overvalued.” This term, clearly directed to Pacquiao after its draw with neighborhoods, suggests that Lewis considers that the reputation of the Philippine has been inflated beyond its current performance. With an impeccable record of 41-2-1 and victories about legends such as Mike Tyson and Evander Holyfield, Lewis’s opinion has a considerable weight, especially given his insightful analysis history and his recent interest in the evolution of boxing.

The implicit context seems to contrast the longevity and dominance of Usyk, who knocked out Daniel Dubois on July 19 to become an undisputed tricampeón of the heavy ones, with the visible struggle of Pacquiao against Barrios. Lewis, known for his tactical approach, could be pointing out that Pacquiao, unlike Usyk at age 38, is no longer up to his legend, questioning his place in the current elite of sport.

Reactions and speculation

Social networks have been lit after Lewis’s tweet, with #lewisvspacquiao and #SoBrevaloradopacquiao leading trends in X at 11:22 am +07. Pacquiao followers defend their legacy of 62-8-2 and their titles in eight divisions, arguing that his draw was an extraordinary achievement at age 46, with comments such as “Lewis envies Manny’s passion!”. On the other hand, critics support Lewis, pointing out Pacquiao’s fatigue against neighborhoods as evidence of decline, with publications such as “overvalued is the truth – Usyk overcame it.” Analysts suggest that Lewis could be promoting a narrative to highlight modern heavyweights or preparing a deeper analysis of current boxing.

Some speculate that Lewis’s word was an intentional blow, possibly influenced by his own rivalry with Tyson and his admiration for Usyk, who follows his legacy. Others see a personal background, since Lewis never faced Pacquiao, but his comment has revived discussions about who deserves the title of legend in the ring.

What does this mean?

Lewis’s “overrated” word could have significant consequences. For Pacquiao, this could motivate him to look for a rematch with neighborhoods or a high -profile exhibition combat, such as the rumored against Floyd Mayweather, to reaffirm his status and silence his detractors. If the tie is reviewed or confirmed a defeat, its legacy could face renewed scrutiny, especially in the light of this criticism of a historic heavyweight.

For Lewis, the comment reinforces his authority as a respected voice in boxing, although he risks alienating the fans of Pacquiao and stressing tensions. The contrast with Usyk underlines a generational change that Lewis seems to support, potentially opening the door to debates about who should lead the sport in the future. At 11:22 AM +07, while the scandal develops, the boxing world awaits Pacquiao’s response – whether it is a verbal counterattack, a retirement or strategic silence – with this single word ready to redefine perceptions and fell rivalries in the days to come.