Formula 1 is in the eye of the hurricane after a decision that shook the foundation of the sport. Just six months before the new regulation is entry into force for 2026, the FIA removed the development hours of development for the Energy Recovery System (ERs), a measure that, according to critics, directly benefits Red Bull and its star, Max Verstappen. This change, unilaterally approved by the FIA World Council of Automobiles, where teams are not entitled to vote, triggered a wave of indignation and distrust about the future of the competition.
The context of this controversy is clear. From 2026, the electrical contribution of power units will be equal to combustion energy, representing 50% each. This change seeks a balance between sustainability and performance, but requires intensive development of ER systems. Red Bull, which had exhausted its development hours allowed in this area, was facing serious problems to optimize its electric power unit, such as team director Christian Horner, admitted. The removal of hours of development hours, in force from mid -2025 to 2026, seems to have been designed to give Red Bull the time required to fill this gap.
Meanwhile, restrictions on the development of combustion engines remain intact, preserving impartiality in this regard. However, the FIA decision did not go unnoticed. Voices in Paddock point to political favoritism, with influential figures such as Toto Wolff, from Mercedes, and Red Bull Helmut Marko, playing a key role in behind -the -scenes negotiations. In addition, Red Bull has received additional advantages, such as the ability to develop its power unit with Red Bull Racing and Alphatauri, and twice the number of hours of wind tunnel testing, creating a competitive imbalance that other teams consider unacceptable.
The controversy does not stop there. The FIA decision questioned the legitimacy of the championship. Large teams, who have invested years in the development of their power units under the original rules, feel that their work was devalued. Some even threaten to protest if the situation is not corrected. The perception that the FIA is manipulating the rules to favor a particular team has fueled discontent between fans, who require transparency and justice in a sport that is proud of their competitiveness.
Despite these advantages, Red Bull is not free of challenges. Delay in the availability of your wind tunnel and loss of key personnel can complicate preparations for 2026. However, unlimited time to develop ERS offers a unique opportunity to overcome their technical problems, especially in energy recovery, an area in which they have shown weaknesses. This regulatory truce may be the key to Verstappen and Red Bull dominate the new hybrid age.
The scandal has rekindled the debate on Formula 1 governance. More and more voices call for structural reform, with an independent body to supervise decisions and ensure the integrity of sport. The FIA, accused of acting with opacity, faces increasing pressure to restore the confidence of teams, riders and fans. Without action, the risk of Formula 1 fragmentation is real, and the legacy of the championship can be stained.
This change of rule is not just a technical maneuver; It is a reflection of the dynamics of power that governs sport. While Red Bull takes the opportunity, the rest of the Paddock prepares for a battle that goes beyond the tracks. Formula 1, known for its intensity and dramaticity, has never been so close to a turning point. 2026 presents itself as a decisive year, not only for technological evolution, but also for the struggle for justice in a sport that millions of people are in love.
