In a surprising and candid remark, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi attributed Vice President Kamala Harris’ struggles in the 2024 race to President Joe Biden’s late withdrawal and the Democratic Party’s failure to hold an open primary. Speaking during a closed-door meeting with senior Democratic officials, Pelosi reportedly expressed concern that Harris was not given a fair opportunity to campaign effectively, especially after Biden’s sudden decision not to seek re-election in the final months leading up to the Democratic National Convention.
According to sources familiar with the discussion, Pelosi emphasized that the party’s decision to rally behind Harris without a competitive primary left voters with little choice and the candidate with little preparation. “We should have let the process play out,” Pelosi was quoted as saying. “Kamala was handed a moment that should have been earned over months, not days.”
The backlash comes amid declining poll numbers for the Harris campaign and increasing concern from Democratic strategists about enthusiasm and turnout in key battleground states. Despite being the sitting vice president, Harris has struggled to galvanize support from critical voter blocs, including younger voters and independents. Critics argue that the rushed nature of her nomination deprived voters of the chance to evaluate multiple candidates and build genuine momentum.
Pelosi’s comments have sparked debate within the party. Some Democratic leaders privately agree that a primary process—even a brief one—would have allowed new ideas and fresh energy to emerge, possibly even yielding a stronger nominee. Others argue that the party had no choice but to move quickly in the interest of unity and to avoid prolonged infighting in the face of a formidable Republican challenge.
President Biden, who initially announced his intention to run for re-election, reportedly reversed course following internal polling and health evaluations. His decision to step aside, while praised by some for being selfless, left the Democratic Party scrambling for a strategy. Harris, as the natural successor, was endorsed swiftly, but without the rigorous vetting and competition that typically defines the primary process.
Despite the turbulence, Harris continues to campaign with determination, focusing on economic recovery, reproductive rights, and defending democracy. Her campaign has recently launched new ads and ramped up appearances in swing states. Still, the damage from a chaotic transition and lack of primary momentum appears to linger.
Pelosi’s statement reflects a growing concern among senior Democrats that strategic missteps at the highest levels may cost the party in the upcoming election. While no major Democratic figure has called for Harris to step aside, the calls for greater transparency, open debate, and lessons learned are growing louder. As the general election nears, the party faces an urgent question: Can it rally around its nominee in time—or will internal fractures deepen an already uphill battle?
