In a bold and controversial piece published this week, The New York Times has sparked international debate by branding Prince William as “workshy” and raising questions about King Charles III’s strained relationship with his younger son, Prince Harry.

The article, titled “The Crown at a Crossroads”, argues that the British monarchy is facing a new era of uncertainty, where public expectations, internal family dynamics, and royal duty are increasingly misaligned. The paper points to what it describes as Prince William’s “selective engagement” with royal responsibilities and claims this could be damaging to the monarchy’s long-term image — especially in light of King Charles’ ongoing estrangement from Prince Harry.

Prince William Under Scrutiny

While Prince William has often been portrayed by UK media as a reliable, stable heir to the throne, The New York Times paints a more critical picture. The article notes that, despite his high approval ratings in the UK, the Prince of Wales reportedly undertook fewer public engagements last year compared to senior royals like Princess Anne.

Critics quoted in the article claim that William has adopted a more “modern” approach to royal life — choosing causes he’s passionate about, such as mental health and climate change, while scaling back traditional appearances and ceremonial duties.

“Prince William appears to be selectively active,” the article states. “While applauded for his work on homelessness and the environment, his lighter schedule raises eyebrows, especially during a period where the monarchy is seeking stability and visibility.”

Some royal commentators in the UK have already fired back, calling the claims “unfair” and noting that William has taken on more responsibility since Charles became King, especially following the health concerns surrounding both his father and wife, the Princess of Wales.

King Charles and Prince Harry: A Damaging Divide

The article reserves some of its harshest analysis for the fractured relationship between King Charles and Prince Harry. The royal feud, which has unfolded publicly since Harry and Meghan Markle stepped back from royal duties in 2020, continues to dominate headlines.

According to The New York Times, the King’s inability — or unwillingness — to reconcile with his son has not only hurt the family’s public image, but may also tarnish his legacy.

“Charles’ reign was supposed to symbolize unity after the loss of Queen Elizabeth,” the article claims. “Instead, the family remains divided, with no clear sign of healing. This unresolved conflict risks casting a shadow over his kingship.”

The article further suggests that Charles’ refusal to meet Harry during the Duke of Sussex’s recent trip to the UK was seen as “cold” and “missed opportunity for redemption,” particularly at a time when the royal family’s popularity has dipped among younger generations.

Public and Palace Reaction

As expected, the article has triggered widespread debate in both British and international media. While some agree with the assessment — especially regarding the damage caused by the rift with Harry — others view it as an unfair attack on William and Charles during a transitional period for the monarchy.

Buckingham Palace has not officially commented on the piece, but sources close to the royal household reportedly dismissed the “workshy” label as “deeply misleading.”

A royal aide told The Daily Telegraph, “The Prince of Wales has taken on a considerable workload, especially with both the King and the Princess of Wales temporarily stepping back. He is fully committed to his role and his country.”

A Shifting Narrative

Regardless of the backlash, The New York Times article reflects a growing trend among international media outlets — a willingness to scrutinize the British monarchy in ways that the UK press often avoids. It also raises questions about how the royal family is perceived outside the United Kingdom.

As the monarchy grapples with modern pressures, generational change, and public skepticism, its senior members — particularly King Charles and Prince William — find themselves under increasing global scrutiny.

Whether these criticisms will prompt changes in public engagement or simply strengthen the royal family’s resolve to maintain their course remains to be seen.