Rush Message: 🚨 The former TRANS-SWIMMER LIA THOMAS team partner requires excuses-forced to go out with him 18 times a week ”after a legal dispute over Olympic participation!

In a shocking turn, Paula Scanlan, an ex -team of team of transsexual swimmer Lia Thomas, asked for a public apologies from Thomas on April 21, 2025. Scanlan states that she and other athletes were “forced to be entered for a week, with a 1.80 -meter biology subway, with a 1.80 -meter gender with gender Biological completely intact the legal dispute lost in front of the International Sports Court (CAS), which prohibited its participation in the 2024 Olympic Games in Paris in the women’s category.

Scanlan’s allegations: “We women were the problem”

Paula Scanlan, a former Division I NCAA -Nadadator, made her public allegations during an audience in front of a US Congress committee in July 2023, but her demand for an apology again gained attention on April 21, 2025, after Thomas’s legal setback. Scanlan explained that the University of Pennsylvania swimmers were forced to move alongside Lia Thomas 18 times a week in the locker room, which at that time had not yet completed totally sexual measures. “The university’s responsible refused to hear our complaints,” said Scanlan. “Instead, we were informed that Thomas” the presence was not negotiable “and we received advice to” change “so that we could get used to the thought of undressing in front of a biological man.” She summed up the attitude of the university bitterly: “We women were not victims, but the problem.”

Scanlan’s demand for an apology occurs at a time when the debate on trans-activation in sport continues to warm the minds. She argues that Thomas disregarded the privacy and good of her team colleagues and, after the lost legal dispute, had to take responsibility.

Legal dispute lost by Lia Thomas: No Olympic participation

Lia Thomas, who won a NCAA Championship in 2022 as the first open athlete, won headlines around the world, but also triggered controversy. The International Swimming Association (World Aquatics) introduced new rules in June 2022, which female categories trans-athletes exclude elite competitions if gender adaptation was not completed before the age of 12. Since Thomas only started her hormone therapy in 2019 at the age of 20, she was affected by this rule and was unable to participate in participating in the competition in 2019, at the age of 20, she was affected by this rule and was unable to participate in participation in 2019.

In January 2024, Thomas sent an action to the International Sports Court (CAS) in Lausanne, with the argument that the ban violated the Olympic Charter and the European Convention on Human Rights. She was discriminated against and wanted to compete in Paris at the 2024 Olympics. But in June 2024, CAS rejected the process because Thomas was no longer a member of the US Swimming Association and had not qualified for competitions from the International Swimming Association. She had no permission to contest the rules. Thomas called the decision “deeply disappointing” and emphasized that these general prohibitions discriminate against trans women and take advantage of valuable sports opportunities.

The controversy: justice vs. inclusion

The Lia Thomas case raised the debate on the participation of trans-Athletes in women’s sport to a new level. Critics like Scanlan and other teammates argue that Thomas has physical advantages due to his male puberty that makes competition unfair. 16 Anonymous members of the University of Pennsylvania Women’s Swimming Team in 2022 supported the exclusion of Thomas from the female category, although they recognized their right to an authentic life: “Biology of gender plays a different role as gender identity when it comes to sports competitions.”

Thomas’s proponents, on the other hand, see clear discrimination in the regulations of world aquatic. They refer to studies, such as one of the international Olympic committee that show that trans women are not fundamentally superior, even if the data situation is still thin. In 2023, World Aquatics introduced an “open category” for trans-athletes, but at the Berlin World Cup, no one has registered what critics consider these solutions not accepted.

Reactions: a political field

The news of Scanlan’s demand for an apology triggered mixed reactions. Some users support Scanlan and see a violation of privacy in Thomas’s participation: “This is unacceptable – women gain respect and protection in changing rooms!” Others argue Thomas: “Lia has every right to be who she is – which is pure trans hostility.” The hashtag #liathomasapology began to tend while the debate continues to gain a trip.

In the United States, the Topic Topic is a political issue, especially in the election year of 2024. More than 20 Republican states have issued laws that exclude transgarots and women from school and colleges. Celebrities like Caitlyn Jenner, herself a 1976 trans-wife and Olympic champion, spoke against Thomas’s participation and emphasized that women’s sport should be protected.

What does this mean for the future?

Scanlan’s demand for an apology, a light of skill casts on tensions between trans transport and the needs of biological women in sports. While Thomas continues to fight for inclusion, many see one step to secure fair competitions in the rigid rules of world aquatic, but at the expense of trans-athletes. The International Swimming Association emphasized that CAS’s decision was a “big step” to protect women’s sport, while Thomas and its supporters denounce judgment as discriminatory.

The question of how sports associations can reconcile inclusion and justice remain open. Some propose separate categories, similar to the weight classes in boxing, but the rejection of the “open category” shows that these solutions are not always practical. For Lia Thomas and other trans-athletes, the way for international competitions remains rocky and for women like Scanlan, the feeling that her privacy has been wounded remains unresolved trauma.

Paula Scanlan’s demand for an apology for Lia Thomas on April 21, 2025, renamed the sports-athletes debate. Your claim that you and other swimmers have been “forced to take off with a biological man 18 times a week,” emphasizes tensions between inclusion and protection of privacy in women’s sport. After Thomas lost his legal dispute to participate in the Olympic Games, the issue of justice and discrimination in sports is more than ever focused. While the world continues to discuss this complex topic, one thing remains clear: sport faces one of the biggest challenges in its history, and a solution that is all satisfying is not yet in sight.