In a post-fight revelation that has stirred the boxing world, British heavyweight Daniel Dubois has spoken out against what he calls “unfair treatment” in his recent bout against Ukrainian champion Oleksandr Usyk. Dubois, who suffered a knockout loss, now claims that the referee favored Usyk throughout the fight, overlooking what he insists were multiple fouls that shifted the outcome in the champion’s favor.
According to Dubois, the referee failed to enforce rules consistently, allowing Usyk to commit illegal moves without consequence. “It’s not fair to me,” Dubois stated during an emotional interview, suggesting that a pattern of biased officiating played a significant role in his defeat. “There were low blows, holding, and elbows that went unnoticed. I was fighting not just Usyk, but also the referee.”
The fight, held amid high anticipation, was expected to be a defining moment in Dubois’ career. However, the British contender now believes the match was compromised by partiality. He emphasized that several questionable moments went unchecked by the referee, particularly during crucial rounds where momentum began to shift toward Usyk.
Footage of the match has already begun circulating on social media, with fans and boxing analysts dissecting key moments where Usyk appeared to toe the line between legal and illegal tactics. While opinions remain divided, Dubois’ frustration has reignited long-standing debates around the integrity of officiating in professional boxing—especially in high-stakes title fights.
“I trained hard for this opportunity, and I fought with everything I had,” Dubois continued. “But when the referee ignores fouls, it changes the whole fight. I deserve a fair shot, and I didn’t get that.”
In response to the controversy, Dubois has formally called on the World Boxing Association (WBA) to take immediate action. He is demanding a rematch with Usyk, ideally within the next week, claiming that anything less would amount to negligence on the part of the governing body. His camp has also hinted at the possibility of filing a formal protest if no steps are taken.
As the pressure mounts, the WBA has yet to issue an official statement, though insiders suggest that the organization is closely reviewing the match footage and referee’s report. The controversy could lead to an investigation or, at the very least, further scrutiny of the officiating process.
Meanwhile, Team Usyk has remained largely silent, brushing aside the accusations as an excuse from a defeated opponent. However, should the WBA rule in Dubois’ favor or grant a rematch, the fallout could alter the trajectory of both fighters’ careers.
For now, the boxing community remains on edge, awaiting clarity. One thing is certain: Daniel Dubois is not backing down, and his demand for justice has brought new attention to the sport’s accountability mechanisms. Whether or not a rematch is granted, the debate is far from over.
