In a move that transcends the world of Hollywood, star actor Harrison Ford decided to team up with Mel Gibson’s new studio, not talking about “anti-woke.” In this collaboration, we reunited with one of the most prominent figures in the film industry, putting aside a lot of resentment and titles, and committing to enjoying the prospect of entertainment.

Ford, who was taken over by his father in   Indiana Jones    and    Star Wars  , has long been at the forefront of Hollywood. For his part, Gibson, a filmmaker and director, is a polarized figure, but one whose stance opposes the transgressions of “conformist” culture that invade mainstream cinema. This political association was unable to combine its own figures, but it also represented an opinion that many were convinced they had a political correctness that has dominated Hollywood in recent years.

Because two major industries were beyond the scope of her career, she was forced, partly because of Ford, to assume a political profile that turned out to be controversial, surpassing Hollywood’s prominent figures. Her decision to visit Gibson suggested sending her into the film industry.

Ford said in a statement about his participation in the project: “I don’t think I have to talk to history that I don’t feel is normal. There are only so many ways not to enter a cinema.

Gibson, a polarizing figure with his shared opinions on Hollywood politics and culture, welcomed Ford as his Aberdeen. “Harrison is one of two great actors of our time, and he dealt very well with authentic stories because he wasn’t looking for progress, but rather wrote films that didn’t fit a political agenda or an outlier.”

A collaboration between Ford and Gibson provoked a debate in the company, and at the end of the meeting, supporters of the “anti-woke” movement were just about to sell out, as a break was necessary due to the increasing political influence in film and television. No, critics argue that the term “anti-woke” is being used in a menu to address social issues and that the new studio had already made disappointing comments before.

Gibson’s “anti-woke” movement was part of another trend in Hollywood that was widespread among all cinemas and actors. This movement promoted the content contained in the book of political correctness, the second thing I defended: restricting creativity and expression within the book. Arguments that films and programs do not belong to a single ideology must reflect a whole range of different perspectives before they can be criticized.

The fate of philanthropy is an act of “cancel culture,” an increasingly impulsive activity in society that benefits the industry. Our defenders considered it important that our culture prevail in an exaggerated, hygienic environment, while authors adapted while employing a limited number of ideas to avoid online attacks.

Ford decided that this project, like Gibson, was in contention for a say in the project, and that he would be considered a limited offender due to political correctness. Since Ford hasn’t made any specific comments about climate change politics in Hollywood, his decision to work with Gibson and his studio are clear indications that he’s been hired for a new film production.

The collaboration between Ford and Gibson didn’t help them, as they raised important questions about the future of Hollywood. Has the “anti-woke” problem become more public, or has a Moda passage been announced? While Hollywood continued to suffer tensions over social justice and creative freedom, the success of this new studio, in the form in which its films were so good, could have a lasting impact.

Ford’s participation brought a new level of credibility to the project, and her participation was so significant that it brought her to a large audience, non-mainstream, in cinematic production more than 30 years ago, as I remembered the original. Hollywood was already in the midst of reinvention a year ago, and it was time for figures like Ford and Gibson to step in. This “anti-woke” studio was on the verge of a new era, one in which encounters were no longer possible: for the sake of convenience, they crossed various vantage points and bustled around, without committing to any particular agenda.

As the project progressed, it became clear that a collaboration between Harrison Ford and Mel Gibson was a big draw for me. Given that this project is a Desafia target, addressing Hollywood trends or ending a phase, its bold approach is enough to capture the attention of two industry and audience experts.

In a world where every move in Hollywood was meticulously monitored, a Ford-Gibson connection was one of the most talked-about stories of the year. Recently, has this “anti-woke” revolution transformed into the industry, or is it about to? Hollywood’s two pesos are slowly on board, and it’s clear this new project has been around for some time.

At a time when Hollywood was divided on several issues, Harrison Ford decided to visit Mel Gibson’s “anti-woke” studio, thus bridging the gap. It wasn’t stated that there was a possibility of not making critical images, but also a disaffected attitude toward a crescent-shaped political correction. This collaboration marked the beginning of a new era in cinematography, or rather, a transitional phase, and I’m sure we continued to have conversations and debates over the next few years.