In a fiery debate that has once again divided the Formula 1 world, former racing driver and motorsport analyst Danica Patrick has made headlines by publicly snubbing seven-time world champion Lewis Hamilton in favor of reigning champion Max Verstappen when asked who would prevail in equal machinery.

The controversy exploded after Patrick appeared on a recent motorsport podcast, where she was asked the ever-popular question: “If every driver on the grid had the same car, who would be the best?” Without hesitation, Patrick replied, “Max Verstappen. I don’t think Lewis deserves that title anymore.”

Her words sparked immediate backlash and debate across the F1 community.

Patrick’s Shocking Take

Patrick, known for her bold opinions, explained her stance by emphasizing what she sees as a decline in Hamilton’s competitive edge and a surge in Verstappen’s raw, dominating form.

“I’ve watched Lewis for years, and I respect his career, but he hasn’t looked like the best on the grid for a while now,” she said. “Meanwhile, Max has been relentless, focused, and nearly flawless. He doesn’t just drive fast — he dominates, controls, and adapts.”

Patrick went further, suggesting that Hamilton’s success was significantly bolstered by having superior cars during the Mercedes era.

“When the car advantage faded, so did Lewis’ results. Max didn’t need a car advantage to prove his worth — he’s building a legacy on sheer talent and killer instinct.”

Social Media in Uproar

Hamilton fans were quick to defend the Brit, pointing to his record-breaking seven world titles, 103 wins, and unmatched consistency over the past decade. Many accused Patrick of being disrespectful and dismissive of Hamilton’s legacy.

One fan tweeted:
“Lewis doesn’t deserve it? He literally changed the sport. You don’t win 7 titles by accident.”

Another responded:
“Danica has no clue. Hamilton was beating world champions in his rookie year. Max is great, but let’s not rewrite history.”

However, Verstappen supporters were equally vocal in praising Patrick’s honesty.

A user posted:
“She’s right. Max is the best now, and in the same car, he’d beat Lewis. Look at what he’s done with Red Bull — pure dominance.”

Drivers and Experts React

While most current drivers remained silent on the matter, former F1 world champion Damon Hill offered a balanced take:

“Danica’s comments are bound to stir emotions. But the truth is, greatness in F1 is about timing, skill, and opportunity. Both Lewis and Max are phenomenal. It’s hard to compare eras, even if they’re still racing.”

F1 analyst Martin Brundle, however, leaned toward defending Hamilton:

“You don’t become the most statistically successful F1 driver without being extraordinary. I don’t think Lewis deserves to be discounted like that — it’s unfair.”

The Never-Ending Debate

The debate over who is the better driver — Hamilton or Verstappen — continues to dominate F1 discussions. Verstappen’s recent triple title run, marked by record-breaking wins in a single season, has undoubtedly elevated him to elite status. But Hamilton’s long reign, battles with top-tier teammates, and resilience through various regulations remain legendary.

Danica Patrick’s bold statement may not end the argument, but it has certainly reignited the fire among fans and experts alike.

As F1 gears up for another dramatic season, many wonder if we’ll ever get to see the two champions go head-to-head in truly equal machinery. Until then, the debate will rage on — one podium, one lap, and one opinion at a time.