F1 NEWS: Red Bull Drops a Shocking 3-Word Decision on Max Verstappen’s Penalty Appeal That Stuns the World.

Max Verstappen’s penalty at the start of the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix has been a subject of intense discussion, especially after the reigning World Champion was handed a five-second time penalty for leaving the track and gaining an advantage. However, Red Bull Racing has now confirmed that they will not be appealing the decision, despite initially expressing dissatisfaction with the stewards’ call.
After securing a stellar pole position, Verstappen immediately came under pressure from McLaren’s Oscar Piastri, who held the inside line into the first corner. In an attempt to retain his lead, Verstappen cut across the painted runoff area. This move, however, was deemed to have given him an advantage, leading to the penalty.
The Penalty and Verstappen’s Reaction
As Verstappen continued to battle with Piastri, the penalty was announced over the team radio by race engineer Gianpiero Lambiase. Verstappen’s reaction was blunt, and he was heard saying, “F***ing lovely,” in response to the five-second time penalty. Despite the disappointment, the Dutch driver finished the race in second place, behind Piastri, who claimed his first-ever Formula 1 victory.
Following the race, Red Bull’s team principal Christian Horner attended the media briefing, presenting photographs he believed would prove that Verstappen did not deserve the penalty. The team argued that the decision was harsh, yet Horner hinted that they were unlikely to pursue the matter further.
Red Bull’s Decision: No Appeal
In an exclusive statement to PlanetF1.com, Red Bull confirmed that they would not be appealing Verstappen’s penalty. Although Horner had previously described the decision as “very harsh,” he acknowledged that challenging it would likely be futile, given that the stewards had already firmly stood by their call.
“Everything has to be objectively looked at in isolation, and that’s a really marginal call,” Horner said. “We spoke to them [the stewards] after the race, and they think it was a slam dunk. So the problem is, if we’re to protest it, then they’re going to most likely hold the line.”
Despite the frustration, it seems that Red Bull has chosen to move on, rather than escalating the situation further.
What the Stewards Said: A Fine Line Between Advantage and Penalty
The official verdict from the stewards sheds light on their decision-making process. After reviewing various forms of evidence, including video footage, telemetry data, and in-car video, the stewards concluded that Verstappen had gained an advantage by leaving the track during his battle with Piastri. The ruling stated that Verstappen’s front axle was at least alongside Piastri’s mirror before the apex of corner one, which meant that Piastri had the right to racing room.
“Car 1 then left the track and gained a lasting advantage that was not given back,” the stewards’ statement read. “He stayed in front of Car 81 and sought to build on the advantage.”
Typically, a penalty for leaving the track and gaining an advantage is a ten-second time penalty. However, considering that the incident occurred on the first lap at the first corner, the stewards took a more lenient approach and imposed a five-second penalty instead.
A Close Call for Verstappen: Why It Wasn’t Worse
Interestingly, Verstappen was fortunate that the penalty was not more severe. According to the regulations, the standard penalty for leaving the track and gaining an advantage is a ten-second time penalty. However, the stewards took into account that this occurred early in the race and at a particularly challenging section of the track—the first corner on the opening lap. This mitigating factor led them to reduce the penalty to five seconds.
Red Bull’s decision not to challenge the ruling comes after the team weighed the potential outcomes. While Horner initially argued that the penalty was unfair, the risks of pursuing the appeal seemed too great, particularly given that the stewards were unlikely to change their decision. The team has chosen to accept the outcome and focus on the upcoming races.
Looking Ahead: What’s Next for Verstappen and Red Bull?
As Red Bull turns its attention to future races, Verstappen remains in a strong position to defend his championship title. With a dominant start to the 2025 season, the Dutchman has already proven that he is more than capable of overcoming adversity on the track. The Saudi Arabian GP penalty may have been a minor setback, but it’s clear that Verstappen’s focus remains on winning races and securing points in the ongoing championship battle.
Red Bull’s decision not to pursue the appeal also speaks to the team’s overall approach to navigating the sometimes controversial nature of Formula 1. While the penalty may have been contentious, Red Bull appears to be prioritizing their performance on the track rather than getting caught up in post-race disputes.
In the end, Verstappen’s penalty will likely be a footnote in the broader narrative of the 2025 Formula 1 season. As the championship progresses, it’s clear that the battle for supremacy between Verstappen, Piastri, and the rest of the grid will continue to captivate fans around the world.
Final Thoughts: A Reminder of F1’s Fine Margins
The incident in Saudi Arabia serves as a reminder of how fine the margins are in Formula 1. A split-second decision on track can lead to penalties that change the course of a race. For Verstappen, the penalty at the Saudi Arabian GP may have been harsh, but it ultimately had little effect on his performance. As F1 continues to evolve, it will be interesting to see how teams like Red Bull handle such situations in the future.
With the season now well underway, all eyes are on the next Grand Prix, where Verstappen will undoubtedly be looking to put this penalty behind him and continue his quest for a third consecutive world title.