In the world of boxing, rivalries and provocations are nothing new. However, when rising star David Benavidez recently took aim at the sport’s reigning superstar, Canelo Álvarez, it sent shockwaves through the boxing community. Benavidez, known for his power and relentless fighting style, did not hold back in his assessment of Canelo, questioning both his skill and his past.
During a recent interview, Benavidez made headlines with his bold claims: “Canelo Álvarez is not as good as people think. He has a past that people do not think about.” These provocative statements have stirred significant debate among fans and analysts alike, shedding light on the simmering tension between the two fighters.
Benavidez’s assertion that Canelo is overrated is a bold one, considering Álvarez’s impressive resume. Canelo, a four-division world champion, has faced and defeated some of the best fighters in the world, including Gennady Golovkin, Sergey Kovalev, and Callum Smith. His technical prowess, defensive skills, and powerful punches have earned him a place among boxing’s elite.
However, Benavidez argues that Canelo’s reputation may be inflated. “People see his victories, but they don’t always see the flaws,” Benavidez stated. “He’s been protected in some fights, given favorable decisions. When you look closely, he’s not invincible.”
Benavidez’s comments reflect a broader criticism within the boxing community that Canelo has benefited from favorable matchmaking and controversial judging decisions. Notably, his first bout with Gennady Golovkin ended in a highly disputed draw, with many believing Golovkin deserved the win. Such controversies have led some to question whether Canelo’s record truly reflects his abilities.
In addition to questioning Canelo’s skill, Benavidez hinted at a murkier aspect of Álvarez’s career. “He has a past that people do not think about,” Benavidez remarked, without delving into specifics. This cryptic comment has sparked widespread speculation.
Canelo’s career has not been without its controversies. In 2018, he tested positive for the banned substance clenbuterol, leading to a six-month suspension. Canelo claimed the positive test was due to contaminated meat, a common issue in Mexico, and maintained his innocence. Despite this, the incident cast a shadow over his achievements and provided fodder for critics.
Benavidez’s reference to Canelo’s “past” might be an attempt to remind fans of this incident, suggesting that Álvarez’s success may not be entirely above board. Whether this is a strategic move to unsettle Canelo or a genuine critique remains to be seen.
David Benavidez’s comments have undoubtedly added fuel to the fire in what could become one of boxing’s most anticipated matchups. Both fighters have expressed interest in facing each other, and such a bout would likely be a blockbuster event.
Benavidez, a former WBC super middleweight champion, is eager to prove himself against the best. His aggressive style and knockout power would pose a significant challenge to Canelo. On the other hand, Canelo, always looking to cement his legacy, would undoubtedly relish the opportunity to silence his critics and add another formidable opponent to his list of victories.
As the war of words continues, fans can only hope that this verbal sparring translates into an actual showdown in the ring. Until then, David Benavidez’s provocations will keep the boxing world buzzing, with everyone eagerly awaiting Canelo Álvarez’s response.
