Lia Thomas, an amateur swimmer who has been controversial in the sports industry, has officially lost her chance to compete in the Olympics because she did not adhere to the rules of the aquatic method. The decision is a huge victory for women’s sports, as many athletes and experts believe that injustices occur in competition when trans athletes compete as biological women.

Thomas also spoke out against world aquatics rules that state that transgender athletes are not allowed to compete in the female categories if they have gone through puberty with male biological characteristics. According to sports officials, physical differences such as bone thickness, muscle mass and endurance give those who have gone through puberty with male testosterone an unfair advantage.

After a long controversy, the court ruled that Thomas’s claim was upheld, meaning he will not have the chance to participate in the 2024 Olympics in Paris. This is considered an important milestone in the debate about equality in women’s sports.

This ruling has received strong support from many athletes who have expressed the physical differences between transgender athletes and biological females. I believe this decision is an important step toward protecting fairness in women’s sports and maintaining healthy competition.

However, trans rights organisations believe this is a step backwards in promoting integration and equality in sport. They argue that transgender athletes would be denied professional opportunities and there were no adequate solutions to accommodate their fairness and competitiveness.

Lia Thomas’s case could pave the way for stricter regulations for transgender athletes in many other sports. World Aquatics is also considering developing a separate competition for transgender athletes. However, this remains controversial and has no clear guidance.

While this decision may have received mixed reactions, it will have profound effects on the future of women’s sports and how global sports organizations adapt their rules.