Seven years ago, the Chicago Bears made a significant move by signing quarterback Mike Glennon to a whopping $45 million contract, marking one of the most criticized deals in Bears history. As time has passed, this signing continues to serve as a cautionary tale about the risks associated with big-money quarterback contracts.

In 2017, the Bears were in search of a quarterback to lead their team, and Mike Glennon emerged as their choice. However, the lofty expectations placed upon Glennon were quickly overshadowed by his lackluster performance on the field. Despite being entrusted with the starting role, Glennon struggled to deliver the level of play expected of a franchise quarterback.

Glennon’s tenure with the Bears was marred by turnovers, inconsistency, and an inability to lead the team to success. As a result, he was eventually benched in favor of rookie quarterback Mitchell Trubisky, further highlighting the shortcomings of the initial decision to sign Glennon to such a lucrative contract.

The $45 million investment in Glennon proved to be a costly mistake for the Bears, as it not only failed to yield the desired results on the field but also hindered the team’s financial flexibility in the long term. The repercussions of this deal were felt for years, serving as a reminder of the importance of prudent decision-making and careful evaluation in the NFL.

Looking back, the Bears’ signing of Mike Glennon stands as a cautionary tale for teams across the league. It serves as a reminder of the risks associated with overspending on unproven or underperforming players, particularly at the quarterback position, where success is paramount to a team’s fortunes.

As the NFL continues to evolve and teams navigate the complexities of player acquisitions and contract negotiations, the cautionary tale of the Bears’ $45 million Mike Glennon signing serves as a sobering reminder of the pitfalls that await those who fail to exercise prudence and foresight in their decision-making processes.