As the boxing world eagerly awaits the showdown between Mike Tyson and Jake Paul, an unexpected twist has emerged, fueling speculation and controversy.

Former boxing champion Carl Froch has stirred the pot by alleging the existence of a peculiar clause in Tyson’s contract. According to Froch, Tyson stands to earn less if he manages to defeat Jake Paul swiftly in their upcoming bout.

Froch’s assertion has sent shockwaves through the boxing community, raising questions about the financial dynamics and incentives surrounding the highly anticipated match. If true, this revelation introduces a new dimension to the already intense rivalry between Tyson and Paul.

With Tyson preparing to step out of retirement and Paul continuing to make waves in the boxing world, the prospect of financial incentives influencing the outcome of the fight adds an intriguing layer to the narrative. Fans and analysts alike are eager to see how this alleged clause will impact the strategies and dynamics of the bout.

While neither Tyson nor Paul has officially commented on Froch’s allegations, the controversy has ignited a firestorm of speculation and debate. As the July 20th bout at the AT&T Stadium in Arlington, Texas, draws nearer, all eyes will be on Tyson and Paul as they step into the ring to settle their differences.

As the boxing world waits with bated breath, the alleged contract details continue to be scrutinized, adding further drama and anticipation to an already highly anticipated event. Whether Tyson’s potential earnings are indeed tied to the duration of the fight remains to be seen, but one thing is for certain: when Tyson and Paul finally face off, the world will be watching.