Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, have recently faced criticism for what some perceive as their attempt to replicate the traditional royal tours they once undertook as senior members of the British Royal Family. Since stepping back from their royal duties in 2020, the couple has embarked on various trips around the world, including their recent tour of Colombia, where they met with Invictus Games athletes and engaged in charitable activities.
Critics argue that Harry and Meghan are “jumping on the bandwagon” by continuing to conduct tours that bear striking similarities to those of the working royals. Despite distancing themselves from their official roles within the monarchy, the Sussexes have maintained a high-profile presence, often drawing comparisons to their former royal life.
Their recent trip to Colombia, which included meetings with military veterans and public appearances, has sparked debate over whether the couple is trying to capitalize on the royal format that they ostensibly left behind. Observers have pointed out that their tours, complete with official-style engagements and public speeches, closely mirror the structure of traditional royal visits, leading to accusations that they are attempting to maintain the influence and prestige associated with their former roles.
Supporters of the couple, however, argue that their efforts are focused on continuing the charitable work they are passionate about, particularly Harry’s dedication to the Invictus Games, a global sporting event he founded to support wounded, injured, and sick servicemen and women. They assert that Harry and Meghan’s tours are driven by a genuine desire to make a difference and to use their platform for positive impact, rather than an attempt to cling to their past royal status.
The debate over the Sussexes’ approach to public life reflects the ongoing tension surrounding their departure from the Royal Family. While their activities continue to attract significant media attention, the question remains whether their tours will evolve into something distinctly their own or whether they will always be seen as an echo of the royal duties they once fulfilled.