Max Verstappen has become the focal point of a heated debate after his explicit remarks during a Formula 1 press conference triggered disciplinary action from the FIA. Verstappen described his Red Bull RB20 as being “f**ked” due to a flawed setup adjustment ahead of the Singapore Grand Prix. His choice of words led to a community service punishment, which he carried out in Rwanda.

Jos Verstappen, Max’s father, voiced his frustration with the FIA’s decision, labeling it inconsistent and excessive. Speaking to Formule1.nl, Jos questioned why Max received a community service penalty, while Charles Leclerc, who used the same word in a later press conference, was merely fined.

Jos emphasized that Formula 1 is an emotional sport, where drivers often react instinctively. He argued that the FIA mishandled the situation by turning it into a media spectacle instead of addressing it privately. Highlighting the widespread acceptance of the word “fk”** in many cultures, Jos stated it shouldn’t automatically warrant punishment unless used to offend someone directly.

Both Jos and Max Verstappen voiced concerns over the FIA’s inconsistent stewarding decisions, particularly during the latter stages of the 2024 Formula 1 season. They pointed to Johnny Herbert, a former F1 driver, who served as a steward during the Mexico City Grand Prix, where Max received time penalties.

Max argued that involving former drivers in stewarding decisions could create biases and conflicts of interest. He called for the introduction of permanent stewards, similar to FIFA referees, to ensure neutrality and professionalism. He also advocated for better training and pay to attract qualified stewards and improve decision-making standards.

Jos Verstappen pushed for the modernization of FIA rules and stricter enforcement to prevent future controversies. He criticized the governing body for being overly sensitive and argued that Formula 1 should retain its emotional intensity without sacrificing professionalism.

Max echoed these sentiments, urging the FIA to adopt reforms that promote fairness and transparency. He stressed the need for consistent penalties and impartial stewards to uphold the sport’s credibility.

Jos proposed that the FIA President should have addressed the issue discreetly by advising drivers to watch their language, rather than escalating it publicly. He also highlighted how emotions run high in competitive racing and suggested the FIA focus on actual misconduct rather than minor language infractions.

Max Verstappen suggested the FIA could learn from FIFA’s model for referees, where officials undergo training programs and receive adequate compensation. He argued that Formula 1 stewards should be treated as full-time professionals rather than temporary volunteers.

By establishing a permanent pool of stewards, Verstappen believes the FIA can ensure greater consistency and fairness across all races. He emphasized that better funding and training are crucial to maintaining the integrity of the sport.

The Max Verstappen swearing controversy has reignited discussions about the FIA’s disciplinary measures and its approach to managing Formula 1. Critics argue that the governing body needs to address inconsistencies and adopt a more professional, transparent system for handling disputes.

With pressure mounting, the FIA faces growing demands to modernize its rules, establish consistent stewarding practices, and create a professional officiating system akin to FIFA’s referee model. The Verstappens have made it clear that the current approach is no longer sustainable, pushing the FIA to step up and deliver meaningful reforms.