Tech billionaire Elop Musk has filed a $100 million lawsuit against actor Mark Hamill, accusing the “Star Wars” icon of spreading false claims that allegedly damaged Musk’s reputation. The lawsuit, filed in a California court, is the latest development in a legal dispute between the two high-profile figures fueled by political and ideological differences.

According to court filings, Musk alleges that Hamill made “deliberately misleading and defamatory statements” about him on social media and in public interviews. While the specific allegations have not been released in full, sources close to Musk suggest they relate to Hamill’s repeated criticism of Musk’s management of X (formerly Twitter) and his stance on free speech and court moderation.

In a statement to the press, Musk’s legal team said: “Mr. Hamill has consistently spread false information about Mr. Musk with the intent to harm his public image and business interests. This bill seeks to hold him accountable for those actions.”

Mυsk himself took to X to address the issue of the law, posting:   “Freedom of speech does not mean freedom to defame. Your woke, your problem.”

Mark Hamill, an outspoken critic of Musk and a frequent advocate for progressive causes, has yet to issue an official response to the law. However, shortly after the news broke, he posted a cryptic tweet featuring a GIF of his iconic Jedi character Luke Skywalker shrugging his shoulders — a move that could be interpreted as a dismissive response to Musk’s legal action.

Hamill has been outspoken in the past about his disdain for Musk’s policies, accusing him of amplifying misinformation and allowing hate speech to flourish. “This is not about free speech, this is about accountability,” Hamill said in a recent interview. “Billionaires should not be allowed to control public discourse without consequences.”

The legal battle has sparked a firestorm of angry reactions, with supporters and critics of Musk and Hamill weighing in. Some have hailed Musk’s law as a necessary stand against defamation, while others see it as an attempt to silence dissent.

Conservative commentators have largely supported Mυsk, arguing that Hollywood elites like Hamill believe they can say anything without repercussions. On the other hand, progressive activists have framed the law as a scare tactic to suppress opposing viewpoints.

Legal analysts are divided on the merits of the case. Some believe that Musk will have a hard time proving that Hamill’s statements meet the legal threshold for defamation, especially given the high standard set for public figures. Others argue that if Musk can demonstrate financial harm from Hamill’s allegations, he may have a strong case.

“This law could set an important precedent for how celebrities and influencers engage in public discourse,” said legal analyst Laura Reynolds. “If Musk finds out, it could discourage people from making verified allegations against powerful individuals.”

As the legal battle unfolds, all eyes will be on how both parties handle the case in court and in the public sphere. Given their history of high-profile feuds, the courtroom drama could be just as interesting as their Twitter exchanges.

For now, Mυsk’s message to Hamill is clear: If you play the conscience game, you better be prepared for the consequences.